implications to the claim that morality (400 words or less)

  1. 1.  What are  some of the implications to the claim that morality is whatever a culture deems normal? Is this view plausible? Explain why or why not? 

    4)  According to ( the author), how do the concepts of moral progress and moral equivalence count against ethical relativism? 

  2. 5)  According to the text, how are contradiction and disagreement a problem  for ethical relativism? Are these problems fatal to the theory?Explain in detail why or why not it may be the case

Text is attached

10 hours ago

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *