1. What are some of the implications to the claim that morality is whatever a culture deems normal? Is this view plausible? Explain why or why not?
4) According to ( the author), how do the concepts of moral progress and moral equivalence count against ethical relativism?
5) According to the text, how are contradiction and disagreement a problem for ethical relativism? Are these problems fatal to the theory?Explain in detail why or why not it may be the case
Text is attached
10 hours ago